Loading…
Stories, explainers and updates that match your search.
The National Board of Accreditation is auditing institutional submissions, with deductions for retracted publications and citations under scrutiny as authorities consider stricter action against repeat offenders.
Dr. D. Y. Patil B-School offers a comprehensive academic journey featuring PGDM programs, global exposure, strong placements, research excellence, industry partnerships, and a dynamic alumni network.
Institutions and accreditation experts propose reforms to NIRF, calling for updated criteria that fairly evaluate graduate outcomes, start-ups, and technical universities and remove subjective factors like perception from rankings.
The NIRF rankings 2025 for top research institutions spotlight India’s leaders in scientific exploration and technological innovation. At the forefront is the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bengaluru, Karnataka, revered for its pioneering research and global contributions across science and engineering. Known for nurturing scientific breakthroughs, IISc continues to shape the future of research in India...
Pradhan calls for transparency and accountability in India’s higher education rankings, highlighting NIRF and NAAC autonomy while urging institutions to improve governance and meet societal expectations.
Experts and Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan have raised concerns over NIRF’s reliance on self-reported data and the peer perception parameter, questioning whether rankings reflect true quality or just numerical competition.
Pradhan expressed concerns over the NIRF ranking methodology, particularly the peer perception metric, and called for additional data-driven criteria to ensure government and state institutions receive fair evaluation.
The 10th edition of NIRF rankings covers 17 categories, with IITs leading engineering and innovation, Jamia Hamdard topping pharmacy, NLSIU leading law, and ICAR heading agriculture.
The move allows both premier film institutes to award degrees, offer doctoral programs, and expand academic offerings under NEP 2020, enhancing autonomy and innovation in media education.
The court's decision follows allegations in a PIL that NIRF rankings are based solely on unverified data submitted by institutions, which may include false information to enhance their positions and attract students.
