||

Connecting Communities, One Page at a Time.

advertisement
advertisement

New Zealand minister’s ‘butter chicken tsunami’ remark on India trade deal sparks backlash

A comment by New Zealand minister Shane Jones describing a proposed India trade deal as a “butter chicken tsunami” has drawn sharp criticism from political leaders and the Indian community, reigniting debate over immigration and rhetoric.

EPN Desk 23 April 2026 05:36

New Zealand minister’s ‘butter chicken tsunami’ remark on India trade deal sparks backlash

A political controversy has erupted in New Zealand after senior minister Shane Jones referred to a proposed free trade agreement with India as a “butter chicken tsunami,” triggering widespread backlash.

Jones, a leader of the New Zealand First party, made the remark during a radio interview while criticising the planned trade deal with India. He said he would “never agree” to such a development, linking it to concerns over increased immigration.

Advertisement

The comments were widely condemned as racist and culturally insensitive by members of the Indian community and opposition leaders. Community representatives described the remarks as “disrespectful” and warned that such rhetoric could create divisions in society.

The controversy has also exposed divisions within New Zealand’s ruling coalition. While the government has promoted the trade agreement as a major economic opportunity, Jones’ party has opposed it, citing fears of “unfettered immigration” and pressure on public services.

New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon distanced himself from the remarks, calling them “unhelpful,” though he stopped short of labelling them racist.

The proposed agreement, described by officials as a “once-in-a-generation” opportunity, is expected to expand trade ties between the two countries and provide New Zealand businesses access to India’s large market. However, political disagreements mean the government may need support from opposition parties to pass the deal in Parliament.

Jones has defended his language, stating that he uses “hyperbole” to make political points, even as criticism continues to mount.

Also Read


    advertisement