||

Connecting Communities, One Page at a Time.

Man acquitted in 2006 Mumbai train blasts seeks ₹9 crore compensation for wrongful incarceration, custodialtorture

Abdul Wahid Shaikh, first acquitted in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case, seeks ₹9 crore compensation for years of wrongful incarceration and custodial torture.

Fatima hasan 13 September 2025 10:33

Man acquitted in 2006 Mumbai train blasts seeks ₹9 crore compensation for wrongful incarceration, custodialtorture

Abdul Wahid Shaikh, acquitted in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case, has filed a petition seeking ₹9 crore in compensation for his wrongful incarceration and alleged custodial torture.

Shaikh, a schoolteacher, was arrested in 2006 and spent nine years in prison before being acquitted in 2015 due to lack of evidence. He claims to have been subjected to physical and psychological abuse during his detention.

Advertisement

In his appeal, he requested compensation for nine years of wrongful imprisonment, custodial torture, and ongoing physical, financial, and psychological suffering, along with rehabilitation support given his health and financial condition.

The Indian legal system provides avenues for compensation in cases of wrongful incarceration. However, obtaining compensation is often a complex and lengthy process. Victims must navigate a legal framework that requires proving the wrongful nature of their detention, which can be challenging without substantial legal support and resources.

Advertisement

The July 2006 attacks involved seven pressure-cooker bombs placed on packed local trains during Mumbai’s evening rush hour. The blasts, carried out within 11 minutes, were among India’s deadliest terror strikes, leading to a massive investigation and widespread arrests.

While a special trial court acquitted Shaikh in 2015, it convicted the remaining 12 accused, sentencing five to death and seven to life imprisonment. One of the death-row convicts died in 2021. In July 2025, the Bombay High Court acquitted all 12, observing that the prosecution “utterly failed” to prove its case, citing unreliable evidence and procedural lapses.

The legal and social ramifications of such wrongful incarcerations are profound. Individuals often face stigma, loss of livelihood, and psychological trauma, while their families endure financial and emotional hardships.

Also Read