Reactions to the University Grants Commission's (UGC) recent decision permitting universities to enroll students twice a year have been conflicting. Although most academics believe that the change in higher education requires a total revamp of the current administrative and logistical frameworks in universities, students are pleased that they will have more flexibility.
Although biennial admissions are not required, the UGC has stated that this decision gives schools "flexibility" in case they choose to "increase their student intake and offer new programmes in emerging areas."
Also Read: UGC issues guidelines for public self-disclosure by HEI's
The universities and colleges were not consulted more broadly by the Commission. Vice-chancellors and associations of universities meet in a number of forums. Regarding the viability of admitting students twice a year or the readiness of a university, UGC did not confer with any of them. Furthermore, it has not specified which programs might be made available every two years.
The Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) does not offer technical or professional courses, although it does offer programs in two terms. While the UGC acknowledged that institutions have the discretion to admit students in two semesters, it did not specify which subject. Adding more staff to serve students enrolled in technical and professional courses for two terms a year would be necessary.
Students are relieved that their year won't be squandered, but they will become demanding if a university doesn't follow this procedure for mostly administrative reasons. Here's where we'll fall short once more.
Also Read: Indian universities to adopt biannual admissions, aligning with global standards: UGC Chief
However, this UGC judgment is focused on the needs of the students.
However, there is a drawback. Students may feel increased pressure to always be prepared for admission examinations, putting their health at risk and leading to burnout. Furthermore, institutions may struggle to handle the additional students and resources with two admission rounds, resulting in overcrowded classes and less attention for each student. Furthermore, not all universities have equal resources, thus exacerbating the disparity. To keep things fair, we need to establish a clear plan, communicate information about resources transparently, and prioritize providing a decent education. Careful planning is essential for getting the best of the twice-yearly admissions system while avoiding the negative aspects.
