||

Connecting Communities, One Page at a Time.

The Delhi government recently released new regulations requiring private schools on government property to obtain prior clearance before raising fees

This action reflects the lack of consistent regulatory procedures in Indian cities and comes after demonstrations against abrupt hikes

Deeksha Upadhyay 02 May 2025 13:39

The Delhi government recently released new regulations requiring private schools on government property to obtain prior clearance before raising fees

Regarding India's Private School Fee Regulation:

Data Statistics:

NSS 2017–18: The average yearly private school tuition in Delhi for secondary education is ₹32,003, which is three times more than the average for all of India, which is ₹11,026.

2024 PRS Analysis: Only 9.08 hours of the 17th Lok Sabha were devoted to private school concerns, indicating a lack of legislative attention.

The necessity of regulating private school fees

  • Prevent Arbitrary Hikes: Uncontrolled fee hikes put parents in a precarious financial situation.
  • For instance, in April 2025, a 20% increase in South Delhi schools triggered widespread protests.
  • Ensure Transparency & Accountability: Mandating disclosure of audited financials reduces exploitation and builds trust.
  • Protect Right to Education (Article 21A): Excessive fees undermine equitable access to quality education, especially for middle-income families.
  • Bridge Socio-economic Gaps: Regulating fees ensures that private education doesn’t become exclusive to the elite.
  • E.g., Delhi’s average annual private school expense is ₹32,000 vs ₹11,000 national average.
  • Enable Fair Competition: Controls promote healthy rivalry between government and private schools based on quality, not affordability.

Difficulties with Fee Regulation:

  • Lack of Transparency: Audited financial statements and charge breakdowns are rarely made public by schools.
  • For instance, Delhi's draft fee legislation for 2025 ruled that retroactive hikes were unlawful.
  • Regulatory Omissions: There is no central law; instead, different norms are adopted by each state, which leads to inconsistencies.
  • Autonomy vs. Accountability: Overzealous control can jeopardise innovation, infrastructure, and wages.
  • For instance, NEP 2020 calls for transparency and encourages private involvement.
  • Overworked Government Schools: Fee control increases demand on already overworked government institutions in the absence of sufficient reform.

Indian City-by-City Fee Regulation Models:

Delhi-clearance-Based Model: Under the Delhi School Education Act of 1973, schools located on government property are required to obtain prior clearance.

Bengaluru: Formula-Based Cap Model: Karnataka's 2022 regulations cap fee increases at 10% per year with audit-supported explanations.

In summary:

In private schools, fee regulation must balance institutional autonomy with accessibility. City-specific models highlight the need for consistent, open, and equal regulation while reflecting a variety of approaches. The next natural step is a national policy direction based on data, discussion, and equity.

Also Read