||

Connecting Communities, One Page at a Time.

The need for integrated, resilience-based city planning

Urban planning in India is restricted to land-use planning. This needs to change

Deeksha Upadhyay 29 October 2025 09:47

The need for integrated, resilience-based city planning

Indian urban planning remains narrowly defined as land-use regulation — deciding where residential, commercial, or industrial activities can take place — while ignoring the broader systems that sustain urban life.
With India urbanising rapidly (expected 50% urban population by 2047), this limited approach is proving inadequate to tackle emerging challenges of congestion, floods, air pollution, and inequitable access to services.

Key Issue

Advertisement

Most Master Plans in Indian cities — Delhi, Mumbai, Lucknow, or Hyderabad — primarily focus on zoning, floor-area ratios, and land-use conversion permissions.
However, true urban planning must integrate:

  • Transport and mobility networks
  • Water and waste systems
  • Affordable housing
  • Green and blue infrastructure (urban forests, wetlands)
  • Social infrastructure (schools, health centres, public spaces)
  • Climate resilience and disaster management

This gap between “spatial regulation” and “systemic planning” has led to fragmented development and poor quality of life in cities.

Why It Matters

Urban India contributes over 63% of the national GDP, but its cities remain vulnerable due to:

  • Climate shocks: Urban floods (e.g., Chennai, Bengaluru), heatwaves, and coastal erosion.
  • Infrastructure stress: Overburdened drainage, traffic congestion, poor waste management.
  • Social inequity: Informal settlements excluded from formal planning processes.
  • Institutional fragmentation: Multiplicity of agencies—Development Authority, Municipality, Smart City Mission office—without coordination.

As per NITI Aayog, less than 30% of India’s cities have updated Master Plans, and even fewer implement them effectively.

Advertisement

Policy Response & Evolving Frameworks

  • National Urban Policy Framework (NUPF) (2018, MoHUA): called for holistic planning integrating economic, ecological, and spatial dimensions.
  • Smart Cities Mission & AMRUT 2.0: promoted data-driven and citizen-centric planning, though implementation remains uneven.
  • Climate Smart Cities Assessment Framework (CSCAF): aims to integrate resilience and sustainability into local planning.
  • Urban 20 (U20) under G20 Presidency (2023): emphasised circular economy, inclusive mobility, and participatory urban governance.

Yet, the challenge remains in capacity, coordination, and community participation at the local level.

Way Forward

  1. Integrated Spatial + Infrastructure Planning: Combine land-use with transport, housing, ecology, and economic development.
  2. Strengthen Metropolitan Governance: Empower Metropolitan Planning Committees (73rd–74th Amendments) for coordinated decision-making.
  3. Resilience Planning: Embed flood buffers, green belts, and heat action plans in Master Plans.
  4. Participatory Urban Design: Institutionalise public consultations and local data in plan formulation.
  5. Financial Innovation: Use municipal bonds, land value capture, and public-private partnerships to fund infrastructure.
  6. Capacity Building: Urban planners, engineers, and data specialists must be trained for integrated systems thinking.

Also Read