||

Connecting Communities, One Page at a Time.

Electoral Roll Revision: The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) Controversy

States raise concerns over the Election Commission’s timeline and procedures for revising voter rolls, citing possible exclusion and administrative overreach

Deeksha Upadhyay 28 October 2025 13:08

Electoral Roll Revision: The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) Controversy

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has initiated a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls across several states and Union Territories, ahead of key Assembly and Lok Sabha elections. However, multiple state governments and political parties have criticized the move, arguing that the EC’s timelines are rushed and risk disenfranchising eligible voters.

This controversy has triggered a wider debate on the balance between electoral preparedness and inclusiveness in voter registration.

Advertisement

Background

  • The Representation of the People Act, 1950, mandates the ECI to maintain and periodically update electoral rolls to ensure accuracy and inclusion.
  • Usually, the Annual Summary Revision (ASR) occurs with a standard cut-off date (January 1 of each year).
  • However, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is an extraordinary measure, undertaken when large-scale inaccuracies or demographic shifts are detected.
  • The current SIR, announced in several regions, aims to clean up rolls, remove duplicate or ineligible entries, and add new voters.
Advertisement

What Is the Controversy?

  1. Compressed Timelines:
    Several states argue that the EC has set unrealistically short deadlines, leaving little room for door-to-door verification or public scrutiny.
  2. Exclusion Risks:
    Civil society groups and political parties fear that marginalized populations, migrants, and first-time voters could be excluded due to procedural lapses or lack of awareness.
  3. Administrative Overreach Allegation:
    Some states claim that the EC is bypassing local election officials and state inputs, undermining cooperative federalism.
  4. Election Timing:
    Critics allege the SIR is being conducted to align with the 2026 delimitation and election planning, raising concerns about political motivations.

Election Commission’s Stand

  • The ECI has defended the exercise as a routine legal requirement aimed at improving data integrity.
  • It has emphasized digital verification tools, Aadhaar linkage (voluntary), and real-time data integration to reduce duplication and fraud.
  • The EC maintains that transparency and inclusion remain central to the process.

Constitutional and Legal Framework

  • Article 324: Empowers the ECI to supervise and control elections.
  • Representation of the People Acts (1950 & 1951): Provide for the preparation, revision, and maintenance of electoral rolls.
  • Right to Vote (though statutory) is integral to the democratic framework, and any administrative lapses can affect Article 14 (Equality before law) and Article 326 (Adult suffrage) in spirit.

Also Read