Telegram approaches Delhi HC against block order linked to NEET re-exam

Messaging platform Telegram has approached the Delhi High Court challenging the Centre's decision to temporarily block access to the platform over concerns related to alleged paper leak activities and malpractice ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination.

The petition challenges the government's directive to restrict Telegram's services in India until June 22, a move initiated following requests from the National Testing Agency (NTA), which claimed that several channels on the platform were being used to spread misinformation and facilitate examination-related fraud.

Telegram has argued before the court that the temporary ban is excessive and disproportionate, contending that blocking an entire platform impacts millions of legitimate users who rely on the service for communication, education, business and professional activities.

The company has maintained that action against specific channels or accounts accused of wrongdoing would be a more appropriate response.

The controversy emerged after NTA Director General Abhishek Singh said the agency had identified more than 200 Telegram channels allegedly involved in circulating misleading claims regarding question paper leaks and examination-related scams. According to the NTA, many such channels frequently changed names and were also linked to other forms of cybercrime.

The testing agency has defended the restriction as a necessary measure to safeguard the integrity of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, scheduled for June 21.

Following allegations of irregularities in the original examination held on May 3, authorities announced a re-test and introduced an extensive security framework that includes GPS tracking of question papers, 100 per cent CCTV surveillance, deployment of paramilitary forces and Air Force-assisted logistics.

Telegram, however, has argued that the government's action raises concerns about proportionality and due process. The platform has submitted that a blanket ban affects users who have no connection with the alleged misconduct being investigated by authorities.

The matter assumes significance because it touches on the broader question of how governments should respond to the misuse of digital platforms during sensitive events such as public examinations. Legal experts note that the case could set an important precedent regarding intermediary liability and the extent of government powers to restrict access to online services.

The Delhi High Court is expected to examine whether the temporary restriction meets the legal standards governing intermediary platforms and whether less restrictive alternatives were considered before the blocking order was issued.

The outcome of the case could have implications not only for Telegram's operations in India but also for future government actions involving social media and messaging platforms in situations involving public security and examination integrity.