In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India has clarified the interplay between civil and criminal proceedings in cases of cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court emphasized that while civil judgments are not binding on criminal courts, they are relevant for certain limited purposes such as determining sentences or damages.
Supreme Court on Cheque Dishonour
The case involved parallel civil and criminal proceedings between the same parties regarding a cheque. The appellant had initiated civil proceedings to restrain the encashment of the cheque, while the respondent filed criminal proceedings for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Act. The appellant was convicted by the criminal court and sentenced to imprisonment and a fine, while the civil court decreed in favor of the appellant, restraining encashment of the cheque.
The Supreme Court, led by a bench comprising Justices Sanjay Karol and Aravind Kumar, examined the conflict between the civil and criminal court decisions. While acknowledging that civil judgments do not bind criminal courts outright, the Court held that the sentence and damages imposed by the criminal court would be unsustainable if they conflict with a civil court's finding that the cheque was offered as security.
The Court relied on the precedent set in the case of K.G. Premshanker vs. Inspector of Police & Anr, emphasizing that the ratio of civil proceedings would be binding on criminal proceedings for specific purposes, such as sentencing or damages. Additionally, the judgment underscored the principles outlined in the Constitution Bench decision of Iqbal Singh Marwah vs. Meenakshi Marwah, which affirmed that conflicting decisions between civil and criminal courts are not relevant except for limited purposes.
The Supreme Court's ruling clarifies the legal position regarding the impact of civil judgments on criminal proceedings, particularly in cases of cheque dishonour. By setting this precedent, the Court ensures consistency and fairness in judicial proceedings while upholding the principles of justice and equity. This decision reaffirms the importance of considering civil court findings in criminal matters, especially when determining sentences or damages, thereby promoting coherence and integrity within the legal system.
RSS backs regional languages for primary education
MNS rally sparks tension in Maharashtra’s Thane, party leaders detained
Ministry of Education asks Odisha govt to verify mid-day meal data
China refutes Indian allegation of military support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor
Netanyahu nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize, cites role in Abraham Accords and Iran deal
China refutes Indian allegation of military support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor
Bihar chokes under rush for domicile certificates as voters scramble to meet EC deadline
Trump dangles trade deal with India as global tariff offensive intensifies
India kicks off first digital census; citizens can now self-enumerate online
China opposes Trump’s 10% tariff threat on BRICS supporters, calls for cooperation not coercion
RSS backs regional languages for primary education
MNS rally sparks tension in Maharashtra’s Thane, party leaders detained
Ministry of Education asks Odisha govt to verify mid-day meal data
China refutes Indian allegation of military support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor
Netanyahu nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize, cites role in Abraham Accords and Iran deal
China refutes Indian allegation of military support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor
Bihar chokes under rush for domicile certificates as voters scramble to meet EC deadline
Trump dangles trade deal with India as global tariff offensive intensifies
India kicks off first digital census; citizens can now self-enumerate online
China opposes Trump’s 10% tariff threat on BRICS supporters, calls for cooperation not coercion
Copyright© educationpost.in 2024 All Rights Reserved.
Designed and Developed by @Pyndertech