||

Connecting Communities, One Page at a Time.

advertisement
advertisement

Supreme Court Lays Down Guidelines on Use of AI in Judicial Processes

Balancing Technological Assistance with Judicial Independence

Deeksha Upadhyay 07 February 2026 14:03

Supreme Court Lays Down Guidelines on Use of AI in Judicial Processes

The Supreme Court of India has issued comprehensive guidelines governing the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in judicial administration, marking an important step in integrating technology with the justice delivery system. While recognising the potential of AI to improve efficiency, accessibility, and case management, the Court clearly held that AI can only serve as an assistive tool and cannot replace judicial reasoning, discretion, or decision-making.

The guidelines permit the use of AI-based applications in areas such as case listing and docket management, legal research, translation and transcription services, and data analytics to identify pendency trends. These applications are expected to help courts reduce delays, improve administrative efficiency, and enhance access to justice, particularly in a system burdened with large case backlogs.

Advertisement

At the same time, the Court emphasised strict safeguards to prevent misuse. Judicial outcomes, interpretation of law, and application of facts must remain exclusively within the domain of judges. AI-generated outputs cannot be treated as binding or determinative and must always be subject to human scrutiny. The Court cautioned against over-reliance on algorithmic tools, noting risks such as embedded bias, lack of transparency, and potential erosion of accountability.

The guidelines also stress ethical and constitutional considerations, including data privacy, security of judicial records, and fairness. Courts have been directed to ensure that AI systems comply with principles of transparency, explainability, and non-discrimination. Adequate training of judges and court staff has been recommended to enable informed and responsible use of AI tools.

The judgment aligns with earlier judicial initiatives such as the use of SUPACE (Supreme Court Portal for Assistance in Court Efficiency) and ongoing e-Courts reforms, while setting clear boundaries for future technological adoption.

Significance

The guidelines ensure the ethical use of AI in the judiciary while safeguarding judicial independence and constitutional values. By combining technological efficiency with human oversight, the ruling strengthens court administration, improves access to justice, and reinforces public confidence in the judicial process.

Also Read


    advertisement