||

Connecting Communities, One Page at a Time.

Millions join “No Kings” protests across US as Trump hosts military parade in Washington

The protests unfolded as Trump oversaw a $45 million military parade in Washington DC, designed to commemorate the US Army’s 250th anniversary and his 79th birthday.

EPN Desk 15 June 2025 06:02

Millions join “No Kings” protests across US as Trump hosts military parade in Washington

Millions of Americans marched in over 2,000 cities across the country on June 14 in a coordinated movement known as “No Kings Day”, directly opposing President Donald Trump’s policies and rhetoric.

The protests unfolded as Trump oversaw a $45 million military parade in Washington DC, designed to commemorate the US Army’s 250th anniversary and his 79th birthday.

In cities from Los Angeles to Philadelphia, demonstrators carried signs reading “No Kings” and chanted against perceived authoritarian shifts in governance.

Registered Democrats, veterans, families, and immigrants joined in, expressing concern about immigration raids, executive overreach, and threats to civil rights.

In L.A, protesters confronted National Guard troops near federal buildings; some clashes included tear gas and arrests, though the majority of demonstrations remained peaceful . In Denver, thousands marched with symbolic visuals—like upside-down flags—while declaring their solidarity with immigrants and marginalized communities.

In New York City, actor Mark Ruffalo addressed a massive crowd in Bryant Park, urging citizens to reclaim democratic values.

He drew parallels to superhero iconography, calling protesters the “Avengers” standing against tyranny, and invoking the founding principles that reject monarchical rule.

Meanwhile in Washington, DC, the military parade unfolded with tanks, helicopters, and 6,700 troops—an extravagant showcase of power that critics likened to authoritarian displays seen abroad.

Trump’s critics include veterans, many from ranks typically supportive of military demonstrations, who condemned its cost and symbolism, arguing it reflected a prioritisation of spectacle over substance.

Also Read