||

Connecting Communities, One Page at a Time.

Victim families accuse Air India of coercion in crash payouts, airline denies wrongdoing

As legal storm brews over deadly AI 171 Ahmedabad crash, families accuse airline of forcing sensitive disclosures as it defends process as fair and empathetic.

EPN Desk 04 July 2025 05:35

Air India Flight 171 crash

A fierce row has erupted between the families of victims of the Air India Flight 171 crash and the airline, with grieving relatives accusing the national carrier of coercion and legal manipulation during the early compensation process. Air India, however, has firmly rejected the claims, calling them "unsubstantiated and inaccurate."

The controversy follows the June 12 aviation disaster—India’s deadliest in nearly three decades — which killed over 260 people, including 241 passengers and crew, and 19 on the ground, shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad en route to London Gatwick.

UK-based law firm Stewarts, representing over 40 affected families, alleges that Air India pressured survivors and next of kin into signing complex legal documents — without adequate explanation — under distressing circumstances. The firm claims the airline issued a detailed questionnaire requesting sensitive financial data, which could potentially be used to limit final payouts.

“The language is legally dense, the implications are significant, and the families were neither given proper counsel nor time,” said Peter Neenan, partner at Stewarts. “We’re shocked and appalled. These families deserve dignity, not intimidation.”

Families reportedly filled out the forms in oppressive heat, some without legal help, and were told that non-compliance could jeopardize interim relief. One key question — whether the individual was financially dependent on the deceased — could, lawyers argue, critically influence final compensation.

Air India hits back, insists on fairness and flexibility

Air India has rejected all allegations of coercion. In a statement, the airline clarified that the form in question was simply meant to verify family relationships to ensure the rightful distribution of interim compensation.

“There are formal processes that must be followed,” the airline stated. “But we are giving families all the time and flexibility they need. Our goal is to support them in every way.”

The airline said no uninvited home visits were conducted and that documents could be submitted by email or in person. Support teams have been assigned to assist with funeral logistics, accommodation, and other critical needs.

According to Air India, 47 families have already received interim payments, with documents of 55 others currently being processed.

Tata Group pledges long-term aid

In a parallel move, the Tata Group, which owns Air India, has announced a voluntary contribution of ₹1 crore per deceased family member and the creation of a ₹500 crore trust to offer long-term support to those affected.

Despite these gestures, tensions remain high. Legal teams representing families in India, the UK, and the US—including Ahmedabad-based Nanavati & Nanavati, Clifford Law Offices, and Kreindler & Kreindler—are preparing to take the matter to court. They argue that the coercive nature of the form and lack of legal safeguards could compromise victims’ rights.

Legal showdown looms

Stewarts has urged its clients not to fill out the disputed forms, vowing to pursue compensation through legal channels. The firm believes the airline’s approach may eventually be challenged not just in India but also under international aviation law frameworks.

As grief turns to legal mobilization, the battle over compensation for India’s worst aviation tragedy in decades is only just beginning — and could soon test not just the airline's conduct, but the broader corporate accountability of the aviation industry.

Also Read