Foreign MBBS Graduates Must Complete 2-Year Internship, Says NMC

New Rule for Foreign Medical Graduates: The National Medical Commission (NMC) has recently stirred significant controversy with a new regulation impacting students pursuing medical degrees abroad. As per the latest notification, medical students returning to India after completing their studies overseas will now be required to undertake a two-year internship after clearing the Foreign Medical Graduate Examination (FMGE). This mandate has sparked considerable dissatisfaction among students, raising questions about the fairness and rationale behind the decision.

The New Regulation Explained

The NMC’s notification stipulates that certificates verifying online practical and clinical training will no longer be acknowledged. Consequently, students who have engaged in online learning must come to India, pass the FMGE, and then complete a two-year internship before being recognized as doctors. This decision is a significant departure from the previous requirement, which typically involved a one-year internship.

Also Read: Expert committee announces NEET UG 2024 retest for 1,563 grace mark recipients

Impact on Students

Many students currently studying medicine abroad or those contemplating such a path are vocally discontent with the new rule. A primary concern is the additional time and effort required to meet the new criteria. One medical student expressed his frustration, highlighting the lengthy process from taking the NEET exam to becoming a practicing doctor under the new regime.

"Assume a student completes 12th grade and attempts the NEET exam in India. If they don’t secure a merit seat, they might choose to study abroad, spending five years on their degree. Upon returning, they would need to prepare for and clear the FMGE, which can take a significant amount of time. Following this, a two-year internship is mandatory. This entire process could extend to nearly ten years," the student explained, stressing the additional burden on time and resources.

Financial and Academic Concerns

Some perceive the decision as an indirect push towards enrolling in private medical colleges within India, which often charge exorbitant fees compared to many foreign institutions. Students who believe the new rule may be designed to dissuade them from seeking more affordable education abroad echo this sentiment.

Many students need more preparation for the FMGE after years of studying medicine abroad. They question the necessity of additional years of preparation for an exam after completing several years of medical education.

A key distinction is emphasized between practical training and internship. Internships should not be the primary concern; practical training should be. Without adequate hands-on experience in hospitals, a student cannot be expected to become a competent doctor, highlighting the significant difference between theoretical knowledge and practical application.

The Expert Perspective

Experts argue that the focus should be on ensuring robust, practical training rather than extending the internship period. They suggest that the NMC’s blanket approach fails to recognize students who have completed genuine, offline practical training.

This decision is seen as unfairly penalizing students who have legitimately completed their practical training offline. The NMC should differentiate between those with authentic practical experience and those with questionable online certifications. Issuing a blanket notification without considering the impact on honest students is considered unjust.

Also Read: Supreme Court asks NTA about reconducting NEET-UG exam, counselling process continues

The Way Forward

The new regulation has sparked a debate about the best approach to ensuring the competence of foreign medical graduates. While the intention behind the NMC’s decision might be to maintain high standards in medical education and practice, the execution appears flawed to many stakeholders. There is a growing call for the NMC to revisit and possibly revise the regulation to balance the need for rigorous training with the practical realities faced by students.

Students and experts alike are advocating for a more nuanced approach. They propose that the NMC could implement stringent verification processes to weed out fraudulent certificates rather than imposing a blanket rule. Additionally, increasing support for students preparing for the FMGE and enhancing the integration of practical training within the internship period could be beneficial.

Conclusion

The new NMC rule requiring a two-year internship for foreign medical graduates post-FMGE has ignited significant discontent among students and raised critical questions from experts. While the aim of maintaining high standards in medical practice is commendable, the approach has been criticized for being overly punitive and potentially counterproductive. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen whether the NMC will adjust its stance in response to the growing concerns and suggestions from the medical education community.

This development underscores the need for careful policy-making that considers the diverse circumstances of all stakeholders involved, ensuring that the pursuit of quality in medical education does not come at the cost of fairness and practicality for aspiring doctors. Visit Education Post News to know what’s going on in the world.

Also Read:
Top Universities in India
Top MBA Colleges in India
Top Engineering Colleges in India
Universities Ranking 2024
MBA Colleges Ranking 2024
Engineering Colleges Ranking 2024
Top Schools (10+2) in India
Central Universities in India