||

Connecting Communities, One Page at a Time.

Maoist Infiltration: 10-Year-Old Girl Killed in IED Blast in Jharkhand’s West Singhbhum

The incident underscores the persistent Maoist threat in central India and the human cost of insurgency in conflict-affected tribal regions

Deeksha Upadhyay 28 October 2025 13:10

Maoist Infiltration: 10-Year-Old Girl Killed in IED Blast in Jharkhand’s West Singhbhum

A tragic incident occurred in Jharkhand’s West Singhbhum district, where a 10-year-old girl lost her life after stepping on an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) allegedly planted by Maoist insurgents. The blast took place in a forested area under Tonto police station limits, a known Maoist stronghold.

This incident has reignited concerns about civilian safety, anti-insurgency operations, and the continuing Left-Wing Extremism (LWE) problem in India.

Advertisement

Background

  • Left-Wing Extremism (LWE), popularly known as the Maoist or Naxalite movement, began in 1967 in Naxalbari (West Bengal) and has since spread across several states forming the so-called “Red Corridor”.
  • The movement, claiming to represent tribal and marginalized populations, has evolved into a violent insurgency targeting security forces, government infrastructure, and civilians.
  • Despite a decline in Maoist-related incidents over the past decade, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Odisha, and parts of Maharashtra continue to report sporadic violence.

About the Incident

  • The IED was reportedly planted by Maoists to target security personnel engaged in anti-insurgency operations.
  • The young girl, belonging to a tribal village, stepped on the device while collecting firewood.
  • Following the blast, the district administration and security forces intensified combing operations in the region to locate and neutralize Maoist hideouts.
Advertisement

Broader Implications

  1. Civilian Vulnerability:
    The incident reveals the continued risk faced by villagers, especially women and children, in conflict areas where landmines and IEDs are used indiscriminately.
  2. Developmental Backlash:
    Maoist groups often sabotage roads, schools, and welfare projects, perceiving them as extensions of state control — which in turn hampers socio-economic progress.
  3. Security Challenge:
    Despite declining Maoist influence, IED attacks remain the most lethal tactic, reflecting both resource scarcity and tactical adaptation.
  4. Human Rights and Rehabilitation:
    Such incidents emphasize the need for civilian protection, rehabilitation of displaced families, and psychosocial support for conflict-affected children.

Government Response

  • The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) classifies LWE as one of India’s most serious internal security challenges.
  • Under the National Policy and Action Plan (2015), the government follows a “Clear, Hold, Develop” strategy:
    • Clear: Focused anti-Maoist operations.
    • Hold: Establish administrative presence.
    • Develop: Infrastructure, employment, and welfare measures in affected areas.
  • The Security Related Expenditure (SRE) scheme and Special Central Assistance (SCA) fund support LWE-affected states.
  • Jharkhand Police and CRPF (CoBRA battalion) continue to conduct coordinated operations to reduce Maoist presence.

Constitutional & Legal Aspects

  • Article 355: Union’s duty to protect states against internal disturbances.
  • Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967: Used to designate and act against Maoist organizations.
  • NIA Act, 2008: Allows investigation of terror-related cases, including Maoist violence.

Also Read